I saw an interview with David Lynch's kids who were adolescents during the filming of Eraserhead. They asked their father if they could play with the "baby". His response was "yes but don't touch it."
Am I to understand that the tiny break between the y-axis and the A-line means that some babies are low enough on the cute-scale to elicit a "no comment" kind of silence?
This site is a little project that lets me make fun of some things and sense of others.
I use it to think a little more relationally without resorting to doing actual math.
8 comments:
This reminds me of that episode of Seinfeld where they say the baby is "breathtaking"
i agree with kwan
and i have to say Eraserhead is the scariest movie i have ever seen
I saw an interview with David Lynch's kids who were adolescents during the filming of Eraserhead. They asked their father if they could play with the "baby". His response was "yes but don't touch it."
At least they grew up looking normal...
shouldn't the line go the other way?
ie no matter how many times you say its cute the cuteness stays the same???
or is it saying that no matter how cute it is people will always call it cute the same amount?
Let's face it, even "cute" babies look like Winston Churchill on a bad day (at least when they're newbies.)
You can also say, "I can see both of you in him(or her)!" with a big smile. Parents always love that!
And, I read the chart as showing we should say the same amount of "cute" regardless of the baby's looks.
Infants have always seemed ugly to me. The cutest a person usually gets is somewhere between childhood and teens (there's a chart).
i dont know if the baby from eraser head had a single iota of cute in it. omg...scary stuff.
Am I to understand that the tiny break between the y-axis and the A-line means that some babies are low enough on the cute-scale to elicit a "no comment" kind of silence?
Post a Comment