Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
About Me
- Jessica Hagy
- This site is a little project that lets me make fun of some things and sense of others. I use it to think a little more relationally without resorting to doing actual math.
You, too, can have an Indexed book of your very own:
Booksense
Amazon
Barnes & Noble
Alibris
Powell's
INDEXED shirts =
adventures in turnkey capitalism.
follow me on twitter
Widgets:
Mac OSX Desktop Widget
Blog Widget
Google Widget
Yahoo! Widget
RSS:
Feedburner
Home Feed
Le Grand Content (a little movie made from these cards):
At YouTube
Booksense
Amazon
Barnes & Noble
Alibris
Powell's
INDEXED shirts =
adventures in turnkey capitalism.
follow me on twitter
Widgets:
Mac OSX Desktop Widget
Blog Widget
Google Widget
Yahoo! Widget
RSS:
Feedburner
Home Feed
Le Grand Content (a little movie made from these cards):
At YouTube
6 comments:
Huh? The intersection between 12 year old boys and married men is empty. ...So the intersection of those three sets is empty. ...and so you're saying there is no reason not to place a personal ad?
I don't get it.
Yeah, this one doesn't quite work. Are you saying that personal sites are primarily frequented by 12-year-old married convicts?
Yeah, I see the point. I think this should have been a bar chart.
You could say 12 year-old boys and married men intersect at 'unintentionally celibate' or 'the woods out back'.
:)
In defense of this one -- if you found yourself on a date with the guy who fell at the intersection of all the categories, that might well put you off of personal ads for good (although usually it takes a much lesser degree of disappointment/horror.)
Surely the intersection should be Michael Jackson?
Or you can interpret this as: You might encounter the underaged, convicts and married men on the online dating sites. So, it's not a good idea to place the ads.
Post a Comment