The two 'you's on X- and Y-axis should perhaps refer to different people for the case of philantropist, as s/he needs interaction with other people to prove to be one.
Then one could discuss the curve itself.
It is problematic to put hedonist & philantropist into the same diagram.
It's all about the needs of these two personalities. The slight curve to the lines indicate: Hedonist- always needs just a bit more than is available to satisfy the need to please self. Philanthropist- always has just a bit less than needed to give to others which pleases self.
i think the line for hedonist should be straight up so that no matter how much money the hedonist has the % s/he needs will always be constant and at the extreme of y.
regardless if s/he is a hedonists, the less one has the greater the percentage of that money you need.
This site is a little project that lets me make fun of some things and sense of others.
I use it to think a little more relationally without resorting to doing actual math.
5 comments:
Shouldn't your axis be reversed on this one?
The two 'you's on X- and Y-axis should perhaps refer to different people for the case of philantropist, as s/he needs interaction with other people to prove to be one.
Then one could discuss the curve itself.
It is problematic to put hedonist & philantropist into the same diagram.
Tommie
It's all about the needs of these two personalities. The slight curve to the lines indicate:
Hedonist- always needs just a bit more than is available to satisfy the need to please self.
Philanthropist- always has just a bit less than needed to give to others which pleases self.
Hey - you have t-shirts!
Congrats - that's cool. I couldn't help post an homage here
i think the line for hedonist should be straight up so that no matter how much money the hedonist has the % s/he needs will always be constant and at the extreme of y.
regardless if s/he is a hedonists, the less one has the greater the percentage of that money you need.
brendan
Post a Comment