It should be the opposite. As global warming increases, so does see levels. This would increase chances of flooding and coastal real estate would loose in value.
This site is a little project that lets me make fun of some things and sense of others.
I use it to think a little more relationally without resorting to doing actual math.
8 comments:
This should be inversed, as global warming increases, the coastal real estate disappears.
Unless this is also to imply a supply demand curve.
No no - I like it this way round - if we simply inflate the cost of coastal real estate, then we can rapidly reduce global warming... Good plan :-)
It should be the opposite. As global warming increases, so does see levels. This would increase chances of flooding and coastal real estate would loose in value.
Our only viable solution is to nuke Antarctica.
I thought it would have been the other way round.
With rising sea levels, I'm about 30 years away from living on the beach.
Ok, had another look. Time is going 'north west' (from right to left) in this, no? Then I agree. Time will hit a wall soon.
I guess it should read, value of "currently" coastal real estate?
I agree with shitfaced -
While the world is collapsing around our ears, I - in Nashville - will be enjoying a short 15-20 minute drive to the beach!
Post a Comment